Evaluation + discussion

Loved the class discussion following my presentation. It was interesting to see how many people were misinformed, it gave me new material to work with in the way of quotes. My personal favourite was "We were made to eat meat, it's science". Your knowledge from year 13 biology that you learned 3years ago doesn't quite convince me :)
The thoughts my work provoked were not constructive, jenny, tara, jess and mischa didn't listen to a word shelley said and would cling to scraps of second hand information in their arguments, whereas shelley knew all the facts and figures and was obviously very well educated on the issue and surrounding issues of meat consumption.
anyway... i ahve been giving the badges away to people, sometimes giving them more so they can then pass them on. Some people won't take them e.g the lady from painting only wanted the one with the lamb because she thought it was cute. When i told her what my project was about she didn't want it any more. She eats meat.

Why you should eat meat and battery eggs

You don’t need to be a physician, a nutritionist, or even have a fancy degree to understand why humans eat meat. Just check the teeth in your mouth. There are twenty of them devoted to eating meat, but only twelve for fruit and vegetables.

If you are inclined to examine the human body further, you will discover, as Dr. Max Ernest Jutte, MD, pointed out in 1936, “the stomach is a carnivorous organ designed primarily to digest lean meat, and that the small intestine, pancreas, and liver are mainly herbivorous and designed to digest vegetables, fruits, fats, and farinaceous (starch) foods.”

source: http://www.republicanvoices.org/war_on_meat.html

great article if you read the whole thing. It makes me laugh how stupid some people can be..

"It's evolution"
"It tastes good"
"It's the food chain"
"Humans are made to eat meat, it's science"
"Cage eggs are cheaper"
"It's the best source of iron"
"It's tradition"


any ideas post a comment :)

wear it with pride

Concepts for badges, and a few badges i have made using images i have found and created with text. Most of the text is taken from reasons given by people on why they eat meat or cage eggs.

Concept1

I want to give people something, originally it was a leaf but i decided it was irrelevant. It tied to my last project but i couldn't think of a reason for it being there other than it would be pretty. I also couldn't think of a possible message it could contain that would make people want to pass it on to each other... and the leaves were not easily transportable, rather a precious object.

In my studio this semester I have been looking at meat consumption and the way meat is advertised. I Don't know quite how to get my views about meat across to people. Bombarding them with grotesque images is not the way to do it, that is not what convinced me not to eat meat. I decided to just go with existing advertising campaigns.

Rirkrit Tiravanija

Top left and right, installation views of Rirkrit Tiravanija’s Untitled 1992 (Free) (re-created 2007). Above left and right, installation views of Untitled 1992 (Free) and a re-creation of Gordon Matta-Clark’s 1972 piece Open House (2007), all at David Zwirner Gallery.

(Photo: Clockwise from bottom right, courtesy of David Zwirner/Gavin Brown’s Enterprise and Ron Amstutz/David Zwirner/Gavin Brown’s Enterprise [3])

His early installations involved cooking meals for gallery-goers. Tiravanija's artwork, which explores the social role of the artist, is described by Nicolas Bourriaud as having a "relational aesthetics." His installations often take the form of stages or rooms for sharing meals, cooking, reading, playing music. Architecture or structures for living and socializing are a core element in his work. I love how he makes dinner for people, and they wonder what they are supposed to do, eat it? Give something back to him? It goes from passive viewing to active participation which is something i value in an artwork


Links to some sites on Rirkrit Tiravanija
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1248/is_n2_v84/ai_18004723
http://nymag.com/arts/art/reviews/31511/
http://www.operacity.jp/en/ag/exh31rt.php

Relational art

A HIPPIE TERM IT DOESNT EVEN MEAN ANYTHING ITS JUST A NEW 'ISM'.......

Relational art is "a set of artistic practices which take as their theoretical and practical point of departure the whole of human relations and their social context, rather than an independent and private space."-Nicholas Bourriaud

The artwork creates a social environment in which people come together to participate in a shared activity. Bourriaud claims "the role of artworks is no longer to form imaginary and utopian realities, but to actually be ways of living and models of action within the existing real, whatever scale chosen by the artist."

In Relational Art, the audience is envisaged as a community. Rather than the artwork being an encounter between a viewer and an object, relational art produces intersubjective encounters. Through these encounters, meaning is elaborated collectively, rather than in the space of individual consumption.

I am very interested in art that does this...
at the moment i am hating documentation, don't see the point in it its just something 'official' that has to be done as proof/evidence. I don't see the gallery space as being the most effective location for experimenting with relational art in what i want to achieve with it.
Exhibiting in a gallery limits the audience to a privileged few that are interested in art in the first place, or have access to it. The rest of us either do not see it or just see the documentation.
The audience is always a select few and it doesn't have to be.... why not make art just for yourself or your friends??